Posts Tagged ‘christopher dicarlo’

Who Hijacked Reality / #617 The gold in the dark room………

Sunday, November 20th, 2011

 

 

 

Journal Entry #617

November 20th, 2011

While people are fighting for their rights and freedoms all around the world I do believe the impact will be in vain as long as we continue to indulge in fantasy thinking. Eventually the fight will settle down and while I agree this is a necessary step to attaining a peaceful existence for all it is the next step that is crucial. If we are not willing to listen to reason we are doomed.

This is my chosen path to support and promote reason and truth. This lack of reasoning is never more visible than when we look at our belief systems in the world today as there is a continuous appeal to the unknown  to show us how we should live. We must get past this if we are to ever listen to what will actually help us.

Having a reality measuring stick would settle most disputes on this planet.

The gold in the Dark room

Imagine if you will, a room filled with many people seated in chairs. Now imagine that the room is completely dark so that none of the people can see anything at all. Not even their hands before their own faces. They are now told that metal cups have been placed under their chairs and each one is made of different metals: steel, silver, bronze, brass-and only one cup made of gold. Each cup weighs exactly the same, is shaped the same and is predominantly made up of different metals with some alloys used to make to make their densities indistinguishable. No discernable difference can be determined by simply holding them. The people in the room are then asked to pass around the various cups to one another for a few minutes.  After a period of five minutes a voice calls out asking for the person who possesses the gold cup to respond. The analogy here is quite simple. Stating supernatural beliefs  is lioke saying you are holding the gold cup in the dark room. Even if you had the gold cup in your hands you would not know it, because none of us can see in the dark.

We may be in possession of supernatural beliefs, which may ultimately be absolutely true. However, the big problem is that we have no way of knowing this because we lack the ability to check them against any type of measuring device.

In other words we cannot turn on the lights….With supernatural beliefs we are constantly in the dark.

A reality measuring stick would allow us to turn on the lights..

What supernaturalists tend to do is not only claim to be holding the cup ( for whatever reasons) but also maintain that we cannot prove they are not holding the cup.

 

From Christopher DiCarlo…Phd Bioethics & Philosophy..

……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..

 

One who carries a cross at some point intends to use it…I would keep an eye out for the nails and hammer they have hidden…

Gary David Currie

In response to;

Jordan Atchison

Commitment to Christ means taking up your cross daily, giving up your hopes, dreams, possessions, even your very life if need be for the cause of Christ. Have you
done this?

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

When someone believes they are the living message or “living epistle” and claim this as there mission is it possible to have a discussion with them?

The contradictions in this message are quite evident…

Jordan Atchison  a devout Christian………..

MY MISSION~

My goal is not to stir up and create dissension. I’m not here for attention, nor am I here to gossip or slander other people. I’m also not here to shove what I believe and/or live out onto anyone. I truly care for the well being of others and do my best in being the light I am called to be. I guarantee everyone that though I will display the truth, I also will take into account how it’s being received by others. We all have opinions, views and beliefs, and I’m only playing a small part in the bigger picture of this world. I could remain silent and carry on in my life not caring about another human being but I know I am here for a reason and have a purpose to serve, as do all of you. I am no better than anyone else and I will never lord myself over any of you. You can try to hurt or slander my name but I will never retaliate in anger. Just know that because I cannot and will not sugar-coat the truth doesn’t mean I’m here to hurt you. We all have something to learn from this experience. – Be encouraged.

 ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

I posted this in several groups……

Gary David Currie

This is from a post in another group. Thoughts people as this really is a philosophical question:

 

 Gary David Currie

Craig has just given the best evidence to show why a person should not believe in god, any gods. My explanation follows;

 

Craig Burkholder… Can anyone demonstrate that God didn’t create everything we see? Surely, people can surmise, assume, speculate, and opine that God didn’t create
the universe and everything in it. But, can anyone actually present proof that there is no evidence of God?

 

Gary David Currie……. Craig Burkholder you have presented the classic argument that the ancient sceptics have answered quit well. This is the 3rd option in the scientific process where we do what is called ” Suspend judgment” since we cannot prove this either way we then do not follow it as true, we just go on living and addressing the daily aspects of life.

What you and other believers do is use this as an excuse to believe which is known as “an appeal to ignorance” The very fact you have stated should be the reason you do not believe in god..

You have just shot yourself in the foot so to speak..

 ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

I hope I have demonstrated that appeals to the unknown are simply not going to work and that we must be rational in our worldviews. The ancient sceptics new this and paid the price. Today we still pay the price for ignorance as seen daily around the world.

I find that those who profess a supernatural faith are rarely willing to talk from a position of reason and will talk within the delusion, I will not. They avoid realistic discussion..

Change is unavoidable, truth is unavoidable but ignorance is avoidable..

Seek the truth always

Gary David Currie

Who Hijacked Reality / #615 Science is a method for determining truth folks not the results.

Wednesday, November 16th, 2011

 

 

 

Journal Entry #615

November 16th, 2011

I have lately heard a rise in the excuse from the faithful and others that science just can’t explain everything, that there are some things science just can’t answer or that it is just one way of determining things as true. I call bullshit on this one and really am sick and tire of hearing this nonsense.

People seem to confuse the fact that just because we have not answered everything does not mean we do not have a means to do so and if we live long enough that we cannot answer  the questions we ask. In order to do this though we need a method to ask the questions and determine if it is true and science gives us this method.

I have asked many who dispute this method to offer me another method that works on all things as science does and so far nothing in fact most answers fall right in line with the scientific method but they refuse to accept this. Why because it will then show them that what they believe is probably not true and we can’t have that now can we. I mean who really wants the truth.

The method may not be perfect but it is as close as we can get right now. It is self correcting and stands up to its own tests. Now I have been told that this is circular logic or self verifying but the difference is we can see it work on so many other things which just adds to the evidence that it works.

People use it every day in all aspects of their lives and yet refuse the validity of it at times. This makes no sense to me.

This is a direct quote from Christopher DiCarlo’s new book “How to be a really good pain in the Ass”

http://cdicarlo.com

http://bibliophilica.wordpress.com/2011/08/03/new-book-christopher-dicarlos-how-to-become-a-really-good-pain-in-the-ass

Here is the Scientific method so we are clear;

1. We often first make an observation of something that has happened.

2. We then consider what caused this thing to happen by posing an educated guess or hypothesis.

3. we can then make predictions about what we should expect to see if our hypothesis is correct.

4. If necessary, experimentation and data collection may be conducted.

5. Further observation is necessary, which will lead to 3 possible outcomes..

a )If we observe that our data positively supports our prediction, then we have hypothesis confirmation..(at least for now)

b) If we observe that our data do not support our prediction, then we have hypothesis falsification and we may be forced to either give up or modify our hypothesis.

c) If there are simply not enough data to decide either way, then we suspend judgement.

6. Finally we need to consider whether there are any other competing hypothesis that provide an equally plausible or likely explanation for our observation. If there are we need to ask ourselves which seems more reasonable. If there are no others, then we may decide to tentatively to accept the hypothesis based on the currently available information.

If we cannot agree on this then we truly are fucked….

I cannot make it any clearer. This is how we determine everything and if you deny this then well what can I say…

We all seem to like to add our little twist and opinion but this is well established and really just needs to be accepted for us to a have a realistic common ground to work from.

The excuses are running very thin folks, the time is nearing when believers will be in the minority as the internet opens up the world god will have no place to hide. Things believed that are unseen and without proof are in the realm of fantasy and secrets.

Science works as a method and has been working for a very long time so again I offer this challenge;

If anyone can show me and prove to me that they have a better method for determining truth on all things then please tell me about it and we will see if it works, if not just accept the scientific method as valid. There is plenty of room from this to argue and dispute many of the findings and plenty more things yet to discover.

Science rocks..

Seek the truth always

Gary David Currie